From the Telegraph in the UK:
US prepares military blitz against Iran's nuclear sites
By Philip Sherwell in Washington(Filed: 12/02/2006)
Strategists at the Pentagon are drawing up plans for devastating bombing raids backed by submarine-launched ballistic missile attacks against Iran's nuclear sites as a "last resort" to block Teheran's efforts to develop an atomic bomb.
Central Command and Strategic Command planners are identifying targets, assessing weapon-loads and working on logistics for an operation, the Sunday Telegraph has learnt.
They are reporting to the office of Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary, as America updates plans for action if the diplomatic offensive fails to thwart the Islamic republic's nuclear bomb ambitions. Teheran claims that it is developing only a civilian energy programme.
"This is more than just the standard military contingency assessment," said a senior Pentagon adviser. "This has taken on much greater urgency in recent months."
Saturday, February 11, 2006
Here, kitty kitty kitty (whack!)
The esteemed Schmidlap pointed us to a clever bit about right-wing support for the preznit. It appears that the true believers will stay on board throughout any storm, including lies, torture, hellish wars, Katrina, etc. so the question became--since nothing seems to have any impact on them, how would conservatives react if President Bush killed a kitten with a hammer?
I submit for your consideration the headlines taken from TODAY'S papers--yup, all in one morning.:
Ex-CIA official rips war case
Says Iraq data distorted to sway public
Cheney 'Authorized' Libby to Leak Classified Information
Ex-FEMA chief: Bush aides informed
CIA Leak Scandal Goes to the Top
Bush administration officials reveal that the Vice President spearheaded the White House's efforts to discredit Joseph Wilson.
Book: Bush, Blair were set on Iraq war despite UN
British author writes 2 leaders conspired
New Shiite, Sunni battles lift 2-day death toll to 38
I submit for your consideration the headlines taken from TODAY'S papers--yup, all in one morning.:
Ex-CIA official rips war case
Says Iraq data distorted to sway public
Cheney 'Authorized' Libby to Leak Classified Information
Ex-FEMA chief: Bush aides informed
CIA Leak Scandal Goes to the Top
Bush administration officials reveal that the Vice President spearheaded the White House's efforts to discredit Joseph Wilson.
Book: Bush, Blair were set on Iraq war despite UN
British author writes 2 leaders conspired
New Shiite, Sunni battles lift 2-day death toll to 38
Now of course, other than the continuing sectarian body count, none of this is new. Hell, Terry Schiavo knew they cooked the Iraq books and sought to destroy the critics of their murderous little war. Additionally, while we all knew Michael Brown was an incompetent buffoon, we also knew that the incompetence, indifference and corruption went way above "Brownie."
But will seeing even this litany of Bushite felonies and fiascos sway the true believers? Not a chance.
Here kitty kitty.....
The Bush Bust--pun intended.
It's real, folks--here is the sculptor.
This bust >> >>>>>>>>>>>
was also placed on display at the headquarters of:
Mensa
Mothers Against Drunk Driving
Partnership for a Drug-Free America
Friday, February 10, 2006
Things you can't make up....
The National Guard Association of the United States yesterday unveiled a bust of a young Lt. George W. Bush. The association expressed its pride in Bush, who is perhaps its most famous alumnus around today...link
So think, the next time you go to Washington, you can see:
and
and...
How inspiring!
So think, the next time you go to Washington, you can see:
and
and...
How inspiring!
Operation Pants on Fire--The National Guard Front
In his speech at the National Guard Building, Chimpy said:
"We removed a cruel regime that oppressed its people, brutalized women and girls, and gave safe haven to the terrorists who attacked America."
Hmm, it seems like I've seen this movie before. I just have one question for the preznit--did you deposed the king of Saudi Arabia and I missed it?
"We removed a cruel regime that oppressed its people, brutalized women and girls, and gave safe haven to the terrorists who attacked America."
Hmm, it seems like I've seen this movie before. I just have one question for the preznit--did you deposed the king of Saudi Arabia and I missed it?
The "Logic" of the Wingnuts
Rush's dumber brother gives us this oh-so-dramatic lead in his column at creators.com:
I hereby expressly consent to the NSA eavesdropping on any telephonic, Internet or other electronic forms of communications I may have -- whether I initiate or am on the receiving end of the communication -- with any person or persons the government has reasonable basis to conclude is a member of al Qaeda, affiliated with al Qaeda or a member of an organization affiliated with al Qaeda.
Just one quick question, Davy...if "the government has reasonable basis to conclude is a member of al Qaeda, affiliated with al Qaeda or a member of an organization affiliated with al Qaeda" then they could COMPLY WITH THE LAW and GET A WARRANT!!!!
I hereby expressly consent to the NSA eavesdropping on any telephonic, Internet or other electronic forms of communications I may have -- whether I initiate or am on the receiving end of the communication -- with any person or persons the government has reasonable basis to conclude is a member of al Qaeda, affiliated with al Qaeda or a member of an organization affiliated with al Qaeda.
Just one quick question, Davy...if "the government has reasonable basis to conclude is a member of al Qaeda, affiliated with al Qaeda or a member of an organization affiliated with al Qaeda" then they could COMPLY WITH THE LAW and GET A WARRANT!!!!
November redux
As we rush to the express lane checkout at "Armageddon 'R Us," it is time to pause and reflect on a yet unanswered question:
Operation Pants on Fire
Chimpy: “Previous Presidents have used the same constitutional authority I have, and federal courts have approved the use of that authority.”
Hannity: "Every president since Jimmy Carter has used this same inherent authority."
From the hearings:
Feingold: Let me first ask, do you know of any other President who has authorized warrantless wiretaps outside of FISA, since 1978, when FISA was passed?
Gonzales: Um, none come to mind, Senator.
See image above.
Who would Jesus drown?
A scriptural thought on child sexual abuse by the clergy:
"But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. "
Matthew 18: 6
"But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. "
Matthew 18: 6
Operation "Hey, Look Over There!"
From the Chicago Tribune:
Besieged Bush touts foiled plot
Reveals details of '02 plan for L.A. attack.
Please.
The bubble boy who cried
Besieged Bush touts foiled plot
Reveals details of '02 plan for L.A. attack.
Please.
The bubble boy who cried
Thursday, February 09, 2006
This and that...
Raise your hand if you think the Obama-McCain episode over "partisanship" was the first shot by the GOP across the bow of the Dem's golden boy. And of course, Joe Lieberman played right along with the Republicans, showing again that Satan holds the claim check for his soul.
Restoring honor and dignity, right? So who does the GOP name to replace the disgraced criminal Duke Cunningham to the high-profile House Approriations Committee? Why, disgraced criminal Tom Delay! There's integrity for you.
And why do Republicans insist on telling people how to mourn?
Our apologies....
Our ad server is down. so please bear with the ugly boxes. When they return, please visit our fine sponsors!
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
What is it good for?
Veteran reporter Helen Thomas gave Scott McClellan fits lately, as the pathetic mouthpiece twisted himself into knots sounding more and more ridiculous as he kept sputtering. He kept whimpering back to his failsafe talking point, though--"we're at war."
War. The war on terror, the global war on religious extremism, or as Edwin Starr said, "War, huh, yeah , what is it good for, absolutely nothing say it again, y'all." But are we at war?
The term war has both popular and political connotations. We toss it about lightly, saying it was a war out there in describing a sporting event to a war of words to the war on drugs to Bill O'Reilly's absurd "war on Christmas."
It of course also has a legal and political aspect, as it is a condition mentioned in the constitution and recognized at international law. But where are we now? Well, obviously, we have soldiers dying weekly in Iraq, but are we at "war?" And if so, with whom? Iraq has had "elections" but as of yet has no "government." We invaded the country unlawfully and are engaged in a military occupation, which suggests that we are at war with--the Iraqi people? Poll results would certainly suggest so.
But as to the "war on terror?" We can laugh at it, as does Terry Jones of Monty Python fame, who says that "what really alarms me about President Bush's 'War on Terrorism' is the grammar. How do you wage war on an abstract noun? How is 'Terrorism' going to surrender? It's well known, in philological circles, that it's very hard for abstract nouns to surrender." We can also recognize the sad truth within Jones' humor that this so-called "war" can go on for as long as our leaders desire because it has no endgame. No defined, enemy, no defined objective, and as Jean-Paul Sartre posited, "No Exit"--or hell.
Let's place this in domestic terms. Let's say, completely hypothetically, that a deranged piece of white trash decided to blow up a federal building because he hated the "gummit." Are we then at "war" with white trash? No, INDIVIDUALS committed CRIMES and were dealt with accordingly--hypothetically, that is. I seriously doubt that we as a people would have willingly embraced violations of our civil liberties in order to catch a native-born psychopath.
This is a POLICE matter. I mean that not in terms of Adam-12 (for those of you of a certain age) but in a general sense of we need to act to prevent CRIMINAL activity and to apprehend CRIMINALS. There is a role for the military here, but our military is being abused. The troops are asked to do things for which they are not trained or equipped, and major portions of the military, the reserves and the National Guard, have been gutted. Recruitment is down, and in a very disturbing trend, the younger officers, the captains and majors, are leaving in droves. Factor in billions of dollars worth of equipment destroyed, and cue Edwin Starr.
I can give you definitions of war, from Sun-Tzu to UN treaties, but that would be fruitless. So too is what I ask for at the end here from our leaders on this subject--a little honesty.
War. The war on terror, the global war on religious extremism, or as Edwin Starr said, "War, huh, yeah , what is it good for, absolutely nothing say it again, y'all." But are we at war?
The term war has both popular and political connotations. We toss it about lightly, saying it was a war out there in describing a sporting event to a war of words to the war on drugs to Bill O'Reilly's absurd "war on Christmas."
It of course also has a legal and political aspect, as it is a condition mentioned in the constitution and recognized at international law. But where are we now? Well, obviously, we have soldiers dying weekly in Iraq, but are we at "war?" And if so, with whom? Iraq has had "elections" but as of yet has no "government." We invaded the country unlawfully and are engaged in a military occupation, which suggests that we are at war with--the Iraqi people? Poll results would certainly suggest so.
But as to the "war on terror?" We can laugh at it, as does Terry Jones of Monty Python fame, who says that "what really alarms me about President Bush's 'War on Terrorism' is the grammar. How do you wage war on an abstract noun? How is 'Terrorism' going to surrender? It's well known, in philological circles, that it's very hard for abstract nouns to surrender." We can also recognize the sad truth within Jones' humor that this so-called "war" can go on for as long as our leaders desire because it has no endgame. No defined, enemy, no defined objective, and as Jean-Paul Sartre posited, "No Exit"--or hell.
Let's place this in domestic terms. Let's say, completely hypothetically, that a deranged piece of white trash decided to blow up a federal building because he hated the "gummit." Are we then at "war" with white trash? No, INDIVIDUALS committed CRIMES and were dealt with accordingly--hypothetically, that is. I seriously doubt that we as a people would have willingly embraced violations of our civil liberties in order to catch a native-born psychopath.
This is a POLICE matter. I mean that not in terms of Adam-12 (for those of you of a certain age) but in a general sense of we need to act to prevent CRIMINAL activity and to apprehend CRIMINALS. There is a role for the military here, but our military is being abused. The troops are asked to do things for which they are not trained or equipped, and major portions of the military, the reserves and the National Guard, have been gutted. Recruitment is down, and in a very disturbing trend, the younger officers, the captains and majors, are leaving in droves. Factor in billions of dollars worth of equipment destroyed, and cue Edwin Starr.
I can give you definitions of war, from Sun-Tzu to UN treaties, but that would be fruitless. So too is what I ask for at the end here from our leaders on this subject--a little honesty.
Winner of the "God I Don't Want to Be Here" Award
Bravo, Rev. Joseph Lowery, bravo!
This was a beautiful moment, for our cocooned president to see how America truly feels about him.
Just wonderin......
So where is the new Iraqi "government" that was "elected?" Anyone seen them around?
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
Thank you, Mr. President
No, not that one, not the retarded criminal.
President Jimmy Carter. Thank you.
Speaking to honor Mrs. King, he said "it was difficult for them then personally with the civil liberties of both husband and wife violated as they became the target of secret government wiretaps."
I say amen!
Inappropriate? Hell no. The Kings lived a political life charged with a vision and a mission. So too, America's black churches have proudly and fiercely carried forth both the gospel of Jesus and the gospel of freedom.
Amen.
President Jimmy Carter. Thank you.
Speaking to honor Mrs. King, he said "it was difficult for them then personally with the civil liberties of both husband and wife violated as they became the target of secret government wiretaps."
I say amen!
Inappropriate? Hell no. The Kings lived a political life charged with a vision and a mission. So too, America's black churches have proudly and fiercely carried forth both the gospel of Jesus and the gospel of freedom.
Amen.
History 101
Kudos to Joshua Holland over at Gadflyer/Alternet (www.gadflyer.com and www.alternet.org) for this tip. Joshua is one of my favorite writers, and he lets me steal his stuff---
Our esteemed attorney general, the man who basically said that we don't torture, we just hurt people really really badly until they tell us what we want to hear, enlightened us with this:
"President Washington, President Lincoln, President Wilson, President Roosevelt have all authorized electronic surveillance on a far broader scale."
Really, Al? Was Ben Franklin flying kites over suspected Loyalist houses? Were the Pinkertons carrying giant liquid batteries strapped to their backs around Confederate earthworks? Please.
(Besides the inadvertent humor, it of course should be noted that he is lying through his teeth concerning the historical use of warrantless surveillance.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
