tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14245640.post3175784308461564579..comments2023-10-24T06:05:38.954-05:00Comments on The Thinker--or Just Sitting Around?: Toon-townPeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17504383209010655249noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14245640.post-4992939962429686652009-02-19T16:37:00.000-06:002009-02-19T16:37:00.000-06:00The more I see of this guys "work" the more it's c...The more I see of this guys "work" the more it's clear that he's a homophobic woman hater (why do those often go hand in hand?). No surprise that his list extends to racist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14245640.post-66549325819559426192009-02-19T15:31:00.000-06:002009-02-19T15:31:00.000-06:00I agree with INN; and there's one point here that'...I agree with INN; and there's one point here that's been overlooked. The chimp was SHOT. Need I spell out what the implication of this is?Carloshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12097922323580156789noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14245640.post-33718728424392763062009-02-19T15:09:00.000-06:002009-02-19T15:09:00.000-06:00Well, my first thought was along the lines of jimb...Well, my first thought was along the lines of jimbow8's second and based on personal experience; editors are complete idiots.<BR/><BR/>But then I started thinking from a different angle... what if Bush had written the stimulus bill and the same editorial cartoon had run verbatim?<BR/><BR/>Everyone would have connected the dead primate to the Commander in Chimp himself and never considered the infinite monkey argument. It would have been a personal statement directed at Bush.<BR/><BR/>One can't help but correctly make that assumption with regards to President Obama as the originator of the stimulus bill.<BR/><BR/>It's racist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14245640.post-19327824093019894362009-02-19T15:02:00.000-06:002009-02-19T15:02:00.000-06:00Occam's Razor applies: by far, the simplest constr...Occam's Razor applies: by far, the simplest constructible explanation is plain old racism.<BR/><BR/>Even for the NY Post, this is pretty bold.schmidlaphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15408511092032665751noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14245640.post-18737170673442499252009-02-19T14:38:00.000-06:002009-02-19T14:38:00.000-06:00It is either A) completely and disgustingly racist...It is either <BR/><BR/>A) completely and disgustingly racists; or<BR/><BR/>B) the cartoonist somehow decided to connect two utterly disparate items (in such a way as the cartoon appeared racist only as a coincidence), in which case cartoonist and editor are complete idiots.jimbow8https://www.blogger.com/profile/03461022862985593535noreply@blogger.com