tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14245640.post1490722261441897217..comments2023-10-24T06:05:38.954-05:00Comments on The Thinker--or Just Sitting Around?: It's not really a 1st/14th Amendment free speech question but...Peterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17504383209010655249noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14245640.post-58752615993165417972008-04-02T16:04:00.000-05:002008-04-02T16:04:00.000-05:00The standards are the same, the precedents are the...The standards are the same, the precedents are the same, Doc--with the exception of the 2nd and parts of 8th, the provisions of the Bill of Rights apply against the states. Any remedy is still technically under the 14th, however, for state/municipal actions.<BR/><BR/>Given that the private property owner could, within some restrictions, toss him, and he refused to go, they could have the ciops arrest him for trespassing, disorderly contact, etc.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17504383209010655249noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14245640.post-89990702404870575822008-04-02T15:56:00.000-05:002008-04-02T15:56:00.000-05:00My understanding was that the courts had ruled tha...My understanding was that the courts had ruled that state and local governments also had to abide by the first amendment (the feds can't hide behind the local cops), but I could be wrong. Mall cops could throw him out, but not real police funded with public dollars.drmagoohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10348370006624173053noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14245640.post-22842556305129186082008-04-02T07:29:00.000-05:002008-04-02T07:29:00.000-05:00Yet it is another reason why not everything should...Yet it is another reason why not everything should be owned by the private sector, as the fundamentalist conservatives would like. Then there wouldn't have to be any such thing as Free Speech.<BR/><BR/>This also makes me hate malls all that much more.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com